Drug Chatter -- Get concise, cited information on drugs using AI GPT chat

Ask Questions, Get Industry Insights … Instantly


Save time and get answers to complex questions with AI chat

What are the clinical trial results for ebglyss?

What Were the Key Phase 3 Trial Results for Ebglyss?


Ebglyss (lebrikizumab-lbkz), approved by the FDA in September 2024 for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults and children 12+ weighing at least 40 kg whose condition isn't controlled by topical therapies, showed efficacy in two pivotal Phase 3 trials: ADvocate1 and ADvocate2.[1][2]

In both trials, patients had baseline IgE levels ≤1,000 IU/mL and an EASI score ≥16. At week 16, 43% of those on Ebglyss (250 mg every 2 weeks after initial doses) achieved clear or almost clear skin (IGA 0/1) versus 13% on placebo. EASI-75 (75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index) was reached by 59% versus 12% on placebo.[1]

ADjoin, a long-term extension, showed sustained response: 82% maintained IGA 0/1 through week 36 with dosing every 2 or 4 weeks.[1]

How Does Ebglyss Compare to Dupixent in Trials?


Head-to-head data is limited, but in ADvocate2's active comparator arm, Ebglyss achieved IGA 0/1 in 33% at week 16 versus 27% for dupilumab (300 mg every 2 weeks). EASI-75 rates were 52% versus 47%. Differences were not statistically significant for non-inferiority, but Ebglyss had a faster itch reduction onset (33% improvement by week 1 vs. 25% for dupilumab).[2][3]

Week 16 IGA 0/1 rates:

| Treatment | ADvocate1 (vs placebo) | ADvocate2 (vs placebo) | ADvocate2 (vs dupilumab) |
|-----------|-------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------|
| Ebglyss | 43% | 33% | 33% |
| Comparator | 13% | 11% | 27% (dupilumab) |

What Safety Data Came from the Trials?


Across 1,324 patients in ADvocate1/2/ADjoin (up to 56 weeks), common side effects included conjunctivitis (7%), injection site reactions (3%), herpes infections (2%), and dry eye (1%). Serious events occurred in 5% of Ebglyss patients vs. 4% placebo; discontinuation due to adverse events was 2% vs. 1%.[1][2]

No new safety signals emerged long-term. Conjunctivitis was mostly mild/moderate and didn't lead to higher discontinuations than dupilumab (10% in comparator arm).[3]

When Did Trials Start and What Populations Were Studied?


ADvocate trials ran from 2019-2022, enrolling ~700 patients each with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (failed topicals). About 33% had prior biologic exposure. ADhere (Phase 3 in adolescents) supported pediatric approval, showing 34% IGA 0/1 at week 16 vs. 10% placebo.[1][4]

Ongoing trials include ADjoin-Asia (NCT04800315) and head-to-head vs. other biologics.

What Do Real-World or Post-Approval Concerns Look Like?


Pre-approval data holds; post-marketing surveillance is early. Patient forums highlight conjunctivitis as a top complaint, similar to IL-13/IL-4 inhibitors. No patent data directly ties to trials, but Eli Lilly holds exclusivity until ~2036.[5]

Sources
[1]: FDA Ebglyss Label
[2]: NEJM: Lebrikizumab Phase 3 Results
[3]: Lilly ADvocate2 Data
[4]: ClinicalTrials.gov ADhere (NCT04146363)
[5]: DrugPatentWatch: Ebglyss



Other Questions About Clinical :

risperidone clinical trial phase development In clinical trials who typically uses polivy age wise? What is the highest us clinical development phase reached by the drug anascorp? Calculating patent term extension does cta clinical trials in europe go toward calculating pte in the us? What is the highest clinical development phase achieved by ablysinol in the united states? What are the top clinical considerations in switching factor ix products? Clinical trial risk management plan template?