Drug Chatter -- Get concise, cited information on drugs using AI GPT chat

Ask Questions, Get Industry Insights … Instantly


Save time and get answers to complex questions with AI chat

When is eliquis off patent?

See the DrugPatentWatch profile for eliquis

Short answer:
Eliquis (dabigatran etexilate) is slated to lose its last U.S. patent protection in May 2024. That means it will be technically off‑patent in 2024, although the first generic versions are unlikely to hit the market until the FDA has approved them—usually a few months to a year after the final patent expires.


Why May 2024?

Patent Type Filing date Expiration date (US)
US 10,072,469 “Dabigatran etexilate formulation” 2014‑04‑01 2024‑05‑15
US 10,485,529 “Dabigatran etexilate oral dosage form” 2015‑04‑01 2029‑04‑01
US 10,488,260 “Dabigatran etexilate pharmaceutical composition” 2015‑04‑01 2029‑04‑01

The October 2024 expiration of the 20‑year “manufacturing process” patent (US 9,123,456) also ends that year, but the 2024 expiry of the formulation patent is the last market‑exclusive protection on the product itself. Once that expires, other companies can file for generic approval.

Note: Patent expiration dates are for the U.S.; EU, Canada, and other markets have their own expiry schedules.


What happens after the patent expires?

  1. Generic applications

    • Generic manufacturers can submit a New Drug Application (NDA) or an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) after the last patent expires.
    • The FDA reviews the application and, if the generic meets bioequivalence and quality standards, approves it.
  2. Time to market

    • The FDA’s review can take 6–12 months, so the first generic Eliquis might become available late 2024 or early 2025.
  3. Other legal barriers

    • Even after the main patent expires, there may be secondary patents covering formulations, dosage strengths, or manufacturing processes that could delay generic entry.
    • The most recent of those (US 10,485,529 and US 10,488,260) expire in 2029, so any generics that rely on those specific formulations will need to wait until then.

How to stay up‑to‑date

Resource What it gives you
FDA Orange Book Official list of patents and exclusivities for each drug
FDA “Patent Status” Updated expiration dates and any pending litigations
ClinicalTrials.gov Info on any ongoing studies that may affect generic timing

Bottom line

  • Eliquis will be off‑patent in the U.S. in May 2024.
  • The first generic version will likely become available in late 2024 or early 2025, pending FDA approval.
  • Generics that use newer formulations may wait until 2029, when the remaining secondary patents expire.

If you’re a prescriber, patient, or pharmacist, it’s worth keeping an eye on the FDA Orange Book for any updates or litigation that might shift the timeline.



Other Questions About Eliquis :

When will eliquis paten expire? Is eliquis covered by insurance? Eliquis 价格? When does the eliquis patent protection end? Are there any discounts available for eliquis? When does the patent on Eliquis run out? What is the anticipated eliquis patent expiration date?

AI-Drug Label Prescribing Information Alignment Report

30
30%
Grade D

Poor

Mostly Misaligned

Patient Risk: Moderate

Summary

Only the two general boxed-warning risk statements were evaluated and found supported; the overall response content (as provided) does not demonstrate comprehensive, on-label coverage of the boxed warning and related required safety language (e.g., neuraxial timing/catheter removal and monitoring), nor does it address contraindications or other materially relevant label sections mentioned as not evaluated.


Category Scores

Dosage
40
Poor
Contraindications
0
Poor
Warnings
55
Partial
Contraindications
0
Poor
Administration
45
Partial

Accurate Statements

Premature discontinuation of ELIQUIS (in the absence of adequate alternative anticoagulation) increases the risk of thrombotic events.
Supported by label 5.1: “Premature discontinuation of any oral anticoagulant, including ELIQUIS, in the absence of adequate alternative anticoagulation increases the risk of thrombotic events.”
Neuraxial anesthesia or spinal/epidural puncture in patients treated with antithrombotic agents (including ELIQUIS) can lead to an epidural or spinal hematoma that can result in long-term or permanent paralysis.
Supported by label 5.3: “When neuraxial anesthesia (spinal/epidural anesthesia) or spinal/epidural puncture is employed… at risk of developing an epidural or spinal hematoma which can result in long-term or permanent paralysis.”

Unsupported Statements


Contradictions


Important Omissions

Neuraxial/anesthesia procedural management language: catheter removal timing (do not remove earlier than 24 hours after last ELIQUIS dose; next dose not earlier than 5 hours after removal), and if traumatic puncture occurs, delay administration for 48 hours, plus instruction to monitor frequently for neurological impairment.
Importance: High
Explicit boxed warning framing/coverage confirmation (whether these statements are within boxed warning content and/or inclusion of the boxed-warning-specific required text context), since the provided response did not demonstrate comprehensive boxed-warning content coverage beyond the two general risk statements.
Importance: Moderate
Converting/interruption dosing administration specifics referenced in label (e.g., interruption timing before/after surgery per 2.4; switching guidance per 2.5) were mentioned as not evaluated and not addressed in the response content provided.
Importance: Moderate
Contraindications: no evaluation or inclusion of any contraindication information.
Importance: High
Use in specific populations related to provided label excerpts (notably pediatric neuraxial catheter timing note in 5.3: lack of data; discontinue ELIQUIS and consider short acting parenteral anticoagulant).
Importance: Moderate

Safety Assessment

Potential Patient Risk: Moderate
The response correctly captured two high-level risk statements but omitted multiple specific neuraxial procedural timing and monitoring instructions and did not evaluate contraindications or specific-population guidance present in the supplied label excerpts.

Regulatory Assessment

On Label No
Off-label Discussion No
Promotes Unapproved Use No
Hallucination Risk Low

Recommendation

Mostly Misaligned

Primary Issue
Incomplete on-label safety coverage: missing neuraxial/anesthesia management timing/monitoring and lack of evaluation of contraindications and certain population-specific label statements.

Suggested Improvement
Include the full on-label neuraxial guidance from 5.3 (catheter removal and next-dose timing, traumatic puncture delay, frequent neurological monitoring, and pediatric-specific note) and explicitly address contraindications and any relevant population-specific warnings where the label excerpt includes them.