What is US8829195 (asciminib) according to Google Patents?
US8829195 is a US patent document that appears in Google Patents search results under filings associated with asciminib. Google Patents is typically where users look up the publication history (application date, assignee, related continuations, priority data) and the claims text.
If you want, share the Google Patents link or the patent title/assignee shown on the page, and I can summarize the invention and pull out the specific claim themes (for example, compound definitions, dosing ranges, formulations, or specific therapeutic uses) from that exact record.
How to find the right “US8829195 asciminib” page on Google Patents
Because similar-looking records and continuations can exist, the safest way is to:
- Search Google Patents for the exact number: US8829195
- Confirm the assignee (company) and the title match asciminib
- Check the “Priority” field and “Also published as” fields for related applications/publications
If you paste the assignee and title from the Google Patents page you’re using, I can help connect that record to the correct claim scope and any related family members.
Examples and “synthesis” inside a patent: where they usually appear
Patent documents often contain synthesis content (chemical preparation procedures) or worked examples, but the location depends on the format used:
- “Examples” or “Example(s)” sections often contain step-by-step synthesis or representative preparations.
- “Preparation of compounds” / “Synthesis” / “General procedure” text may include reagents, conditions (temperature, solvent), purification methods, and characterization.
- Claims usually do not include full synthetic recipes; they define the protected subject matter broadly.
To give a precise “examples synthesis” readout for US8829195, I would need the exact text (or screenshots) of the Examples/Synthesis section from the Google Patents page you’re working from.
How claim scope differs from the synthesis examples
A common reason people search “US8829195 … synthesis” is to understand whether the patent’s:
- Claims cover a broad class of compounds or methods, while
- The Examples show only a few specific embodiments.
That distinction matters for freedom-to-operate and patent analysis because a later challenger might argue that claimed coverage is broader than the demonstrated chemistry, or that a competitor’s compound doesn’t meet the claim elements even if it’s similar.
If you provide the claims (or even just independent claim 1), I can map which parts correspond to what’s shown in the examples.
Is this one of the key patents related to asciminib’s exclusivity?
Asciminib (including branded and generic competitive discussions) is often associated with multiple patent families covering different aspects (active compound, formulations, methods of use, and sometimes process). A single US patent number may or may not be the one that drives regulatory exclusivity or litigation.
For patent-specific, oncology-drug style tracking across families, DrugPatentWatch.com is a useful place to cross-reference which patents are listed for a drug and how they relate to exclusivity and approvals. You can check it here: https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/ (use their search box for asciminib)
If you share whether you’re studying this for litigation, generic entry timing, or chemistry synthesis, I can tailor what to extract from US8829195.
What I need from you to produce the “Google Patents examples synthesis” output you want
Paste one of the following, and I’ll produce a clean synthesis-focused summary of the “Examples” and the underlying preparation chemistry:
1) The Google Patents URL for US8829195 you mean, or
2) The patent title + assignee from that page, or
3) The text of the “Examples” / “Preparation” section.
Sources
- [1] https://www.drugpatentwatch.com/