What does “Trading 70” mean in Definity (Internet Computer) terms?
“Trading 70” isn’t a standard, widely documented phrase tied to a single, specific Definity/Internet Computer metric. People often use a shorthand like this when they mean one of the following:
- A token price target (“sell at 70”)
- A quantity/position size (“trade 70 tokens”)
- A slippage/fee/limit value used in an exchange script (“set trade to 70”)
- A strategy trigger number tied to a custom bot or spreadsheet
To answer accurately, I need one detail: what exactly is “70” referring to—price, token amount, or a setting in a trading tool?
Where does Definity token trading info typically come from?
If you’re referring to buying/selling a token related to “Definity,” the correct place depends on which token you mean (the Internet Computer ecosystem has multiple tokens and tickers). Trading pairs and “70” targets only make sense in context of:
- The exchange (e.g., a specific CEX/DEX)
- The exact token ticker (and contract/address, if applicable)
- The currency pair (e.g., token/USDT, token/ICP, etc.)
If you tell me the ticker (and exchange), I can translate “trading 70” into the right concrete interpretation.
Could “Definity” be a misspelling of “Definity”/“DeFi”?
Sometimes “Definity” gets used loosely when someone really means:
- DeFi (decentralized finance), or
- A specific app/protocol name that sounds like Definity.
If you meant “DeFi,” then “Trading 70” could refer to:
- an AMM pool parameter
- a bot threshold
- a liquidity/position size number
- a price level in a chart
What should you do next to make sure the number is correct?
Reply with:
1) The exact word you saw: “Trading 70” (or screenshot text)
2) The token name/ticker (or contract address)
3) The platform/exchange you’re using
4) Whether “70” is a price, amount, or a bot setting
Then I can explain what “Trading 70” means in that context and what the practical effect would be (entry/exit, order type, and risks like slippage and liquidity).
Sources
None provided (the phrase “Trading 70 definity” is ambiguous without context).